9 Dec 2024 3:00 pm
----------------------------------------------------*Beekeeper » 09 Dec 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ What you FAIL to comprehend is that NIXON had no "question" to be resolved for any CRIMINAL PERSECUTION. Trump did and ASKED THE COURT to determine if the SAME IMMUNITY that they ruled Nixon had applied to CRIMINAL ACCUSATIONS AS WELL.
And since the "charges" were related to a STATE PERSECUTION, it required a SCOTUS RULING of immunity on a FEDERAL LEVEL.
You really are ONE **** PIECE OF **** IDIOT of the 1000th degree.
Trump was given NO "added" immunity that didn't ALREADY EXIST under the NIXON ruling. They only determined that the same IMMUNITY afforded Nixon applied equally to CRIMINAL CASES FOR IMMUNITY FOR OFFICIAL LEGAL ACTS AS PRESIDENT.
As a NOTE IN THE RULING, any actual CRIMES COMMITTED by President while in office are not OFFICIAL ACTS, but CRIMES. MURDER is not an official act, but a CRIME. CORRUPTION is not an official act, but a CRIME and both would be held accountable in a COURT OF LAW without any immunity to prosecution since NEITHER are permitted acts under the Constitution.
The SCOTUS did NOT rule on the merit of the NY State case which precluded the filing and left THAT to the NY State courts to determine.
You really need to SHUT THE **** UP and GO BACK INTO THAT SLIMEY HOLE YOU CRAWLED OUT OF, ****!!
Roberts noted. “There is no immunity for unofficial acts,” he concluded.Roberts then sent the case back to a federal district trial court to reconsider its charges against Trump and draw distinctions between his alleged official and unofficial actions.